1 Tim 2:15 has been labeled as one of the truly strange verses of the Bible, and appropriately so. I know of no one who takes it “literally” (although I assume that someone somewhere has tried to do so).
But actually it does illustrate an interesting concept in Greek, and that is the overlapping of semantic ranges.
There are two Greek words meaning “to save.” The most common is σωζω. It has a wide range of meaning, from “to preserve or rescue fr. natural dangers and afflictions, save, keep from harm, preserve, rescue” to “to save or preserve from transcendent danger or destruction, save/preserve from eternal death” (BDAG). σωζω is the normal word for spiritual salvation.
The other word is ῥυομαι. It has a more restricted meaning, “to rescue from danger, save, rescue, deliver, preserve” (BDAG). Its focus is more on rescue from physical danger.
Paul uses ῥυομαι when describing his first court appearance. “So I was rescued (ερρυσθην) from the lion’s mouth. The Lord will rescue (ρυσεται) me from every evil deed and bring me safely (σωσει) into his heavenly kingdom” (2 Tim 4:17-18). The issue is not Paul’s salvation. He was rescued from the attacks in court (although he knew his death was imminent).
But notice the play on words. Paul did know that the culmination of his salvation lay ahead, and that his savior would bring him home; that is the force of σωσει. The ESV’s “bring me safely” is unfortunate (so also the NIV, TNIV, NET, NLT). We changed the RSV’s “save me” (still in the NRSV); I assume I lost that vote.
So what about women and childbirth? As I recall, Paul is quite consistent with his use of σωζω. (I am on the road headed to a retreat in Canada and can’t check my commentary.) It is one of the strongest arguments that in v 15 Paul is talking about the woman’s spiritual salvation. Any notion of godly women being kept safe through the process of childbirth (as the first printing of the NIV had it) is denied by reality. So if women are saved by bearing children, what is that all about?
The position I take in my commentary is that Paul is talking about how women work out their salvation, in the same sense that Paul says all of us should work out our salvation (σωτηριαν κατεργαζεσθε) with fear and trembling (Phil 2:12). The women were not to listen to what the opponents were teaching, looking for other avenues of how their Christian commitment should show itself, which probably included staying out of marriage (1 Tim 4:3) and hence childbirth. But they were to stay in their marriages and see their God-given privilege of bearing children as something to be enjoyed and treasured.
But whatever your specific interpretation, Paul’s consistent use of σωζω argues for some understanding of spiritual salvation in this passage, and not some other meaning more accurately conveyed by ῥυομαι.
William D. [Bill] Mounce posts every Monday about the Greek language, exegesis, and related topics at Koinonia. He is the author of numerous books, including the bestselling Basics of Biblical Greek, and general editor for Mounce's Complete Expository Dictionary of the Old and New Testament Words. He served as the New Testament chair of the English Standard Version Bible translation. Learn more and visit Bill's blog (co-authored with scholar and his father Bob Mounce) at www.billmounce.com.




Do you think Paul is drawing on protological themes? v. 15 follows immediately on the heals of two points made concerning Adam and Eve. Do you think Paul is playing with the seed promise?
Posted by: John Higgins | Monday, May 04, 2009 at 12:40 PM
I had always been given to understand that Paul was making a veiled reference to the birth of Christ...
Posted by: Larry | Tuesday, May 05, 2009 at 08:34 AM
You can't quote a negative passage on staying out of marriage (1 Tim. 4:3) and not quote the positive for those who've been so gifted - 1. Cor. 7. Nor is it really helpful to tie childbearing in with salvation without addressing the very real issue of infertility - in God's sovereignty, even many biblical women struggled with that.
Posted by: Ann | Tuesday, May 05, 2009 at 09:47 AM
I just finished a paper on this passage (2:8-15) a week ago. My interpretation of verse 15 is heavily influenced by this article by Andreas Kostenberger. I'd highly recommend it; it seems to make the verse fit quite well in its context, and is very reasonable exegesis.
Check it out here:
Saved Through Childbearing?
Posted by: Kyle | Tuesday, May 05, 2009 at 11:33 AM
By the way, I guess I could actually articulate my interpretation. There are three basic elements:
1) I think Paul's use of sozo here carries the less common sense of preservation, or being kept safe (Cf. 1 Cor. 3:15; 7:16; 1 Tim. 4:16; 2 Tim. 4:18).
2) It does not mean that women will be physically protected from the difficulties of childbirth. Rather, with Eve's deception by Satan in view from verse 14, Paul means to say that the woman will be kept safe from deception by the evil one.
3) Childbearing may serve as a representative of the domestic sphere of a woman's role (See 1 Tim. 5:14-15, where teknogonia (childbearing) is used in connection with marriage and managing of the household.).
Thus...
If a woman embraces her role in the domestic sphere of life (represented in v. 15 by childbearing), she will be kept safe from being deceived by Satan into exchanging God's gender design for the world's (which is fully in keeping with the context of 1 Tim. 2:12-15).
Posted by: Kyle | Tuesday, May 05, 2009 at 11:57 AM
One can note that God does not preserve women from dying in childbirth.
One can also note that God blesses women who perform needed work that has nothing to do with the domestic. ie. Phoebe, Deborah,
These are both equally true. I don't see how all women, with or without children, can be restricted from teaching at university or doing some of the other things that men do.
Posted by: Sue | Tuesday, May 05, 2009 at 06:04 PM
I don’t know any Greek, so please accept my apologies in advance. But the Timothy passage looks to me, in context, to be a prophecy about Eve (v13-15). Not about women in general. Even though she sinned, their race (humans) will be saved by her offspring (the Messiah). And “––if they continue in faith and love and holiness, with self-control” sounds like the covenant agreement God entered into with his people. Which is only possible for us to uphold in The Messiah.
I also feel that 1 Corinthians 7:6-8 makes it clear that both marriage and celibacy are blessings (gifts from God) for both men and women. He goes as far as to say it's better to remain single, but if we can't control our sexual passions we should marry.
While I agree that women have roles in submission to their husbands and a wife’s role is in support of her husband in care of the home –– the rot we have in our hearts can grow whether we are devoted to our homes and husbands or not. Jesus saves, not wifely devotion –– even atheists can be devoted wives.
I’ve noticed that most preaching nowadays is just aimed at families or couples. We should be careful of this. There are more singles out there today than ever before and also many couples who marry late facing infertility. The gospel is news for everyone, not just families. With respect, I feel sometimes the church makes an idol out of marriage and the family.
Posted by: A Christian Wife | Tuesday, May 05, 2009 at 06:15 PM
Childbirth does confer a protection against certain types of cancer developing. This is one valid interpretation of GOD saving women from danger through childbirth.
From Strong's:
G4982
σώζω
sōzō
sode'-zo
From a primary word σῶς sōs̄ (contraction for the obsolete σάος saos, “safe”); to save, that is, deliver or protect (literally or figuratively): - heal, preserve, save (self), do well, be (make) whole.
From Thayer:
G4982
σώζω
sōzō
Thayer Definition:
1) to save, keep safe and sound, to rescue from danger or destruction
1a) one (from injury or peril)
1a1) to save a suffering one (from perishing), i.e. one suffering from disease, to make well, heal, restore to health
1b1) to preserve one who is in danger of destruction, to save or rescue
1b) to save in the technical biblical sense
1b1) negatively
1b1a) to deliver from the penalties of the Messianic judgment
1b1b) to save from the evils which obstruct the reception of the Messianic deliverance
Part of Speech: verb
A Related Word by Thayer’s/Strong’s Number: from a primary sos (contraction for obsolete saoz, “safe”)
Citing in TDNT: 7:965, 1132
Posted by: Amanda | Tuesday, May 05, 2009 at 06:31 PM
First, if we look at other texts we can see that this verse is unlikely to be talking about women's spiritual salvation,
27As he said these things, a woman in the crowd raised her voice and said to him, "Blessed is the womb that bore you, and the breasts at which you nursed!" 28But he said, "Blessed rather are those who hear the word of God and keep it!" Luke 11
Second, there are many promises in scripture that do not have immediate fulfillment.
2(B) "Honor your father and mother" (this is the first commandment with a promise), 3"that it may go well with you and that you may live long in the land." Eph. 6
Third, we see in other epistles, that the word sozo is used for physical healing,
15And the prayer of faith shall save the sick, and the Lord shall raise him up; and if he have committed sins, they shall be forgiven him. James 5
This passage in James is not ambiguous, as it continues,
16Confess your faults one to another, and pray one for another, that ye may be healed. The effectual fervent prayer of a righteous man availeth much.
I have not yet seen compelling evidence to support any particular exegesis of 1 Tim. 2:15. However, I think we can be certain that Christ did not tell women that they were to seek spiritual salvation by bearing children.
For behold, the days are coming when they will say, 'Blessed are the barren and the wombs that never bore and the breasts that never nursed!'
Jesus said, "Truly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or mother or father or children or lands, for my sake and for the gospel, 30who will not receive a hundredfold now in this time, houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions, and in the age to come eternal life.
Many godly women have committed their lives to mission work and given up the opporunity to bear children for the sake of the gospel.
Posted by: Sue | Wednesday, May 06, 2009 at 12:09 AM