As the discussion around the doctine of hell continues, William Crockett was kind enough to take time out of his schedule to do an interview about the current controversy and the book Four Views on Hell which he edited and contributed to.
Q: First of all could you give us a little of your own background?
I was born in Canada, a B.A. in Philosophy (Univ. Winnipeg), M.Div. in New Testament studies (Princeton Seminary), and a Ph.D. in New Testament (Univ. Glasgow). I have been a professor of New Testament studies at Alliance Seminary in New York for 30 years.
Q: You wrote the Metaphorical View section in Four Views on Hell, could you summarize the case you made there?
Sure. The traditional view of hell in Christianity is that one day vast numbers of people will be cast away from the presence of God, which means that people we dearly love—friends, family members, the local grocer—if they die outside the faith, will be plunged into hell's unquenchable fires (Matt. 7:13-14). The question is, then, whether such a teaching could be literally true. Will a portion of creation find ease in heaven, while the rest roast in fire?
The metaphorical view says that hell is a real place, a place of serious eternal judgment, but a place whose exact nature is best left in the hands of God. Just as the images of heaven—golden streets, jeweled walls, and sparkling rivers—are meant to give us hope beyond the grave, the images of hell are meant to give us pause about our eternal destinies. We don’t want to over-literalize these images lest we end up with a hell like Nebuchadnezzar's belching furnace, or a place where the damned receive grisly beatings (Lk 12:47), or worse, a nightmarish hell where eternal worms gnaw forever on the flesh of the lost (Mk 9:48).
No, it’s better to leave the exact nature of final judgment in the hands of God. The images of heaven and hell are meant to be metaphors; one depicting a place of immeasurable happiness, the other of profound misery.